Ruben Bemelmans vs Marius Copil Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L L L L L L
Form
L L L L L L L L L LHead-To-Head: Bemelmans 3 - 2 Copil
They have played 11 sets in total, with Bemelmans winning 6 and Copil winning 5. The last match between Bemelmans and Copil was at the European Open - Antwerp, 13-10-2019, Q1 round, I.hard with Marius Copil getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ruben Bemelmans | 3 |
| Marius Copil | 2 |
European Open - Antwerp(13-10-2019)
6
4
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Maneiro VS Sherif PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Uchijima VS Montgomery PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Marius Copil
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
15
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
16 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| 6-3 6-7(6) 6-3 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Marius Copil
55%
(
60 of
110)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
94)
8
Aces
12
9
Double Faults
5
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Marius Copil
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
33 of
70)
4
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
1
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
28 of
33)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 7-6(2) |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Marius Copil
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
8
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
7
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
18 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
27 of
90)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 61 | Games Won | 58 |
| 25 | Aces (Total) | 60 |
| 14 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
| 1:28:46 | Average Match Time | 1:28:46 |
| 65% (229/352) | 1st Serve % | 56% (200/359) |
| 81% (186/229) | 1st Serve Win % | 80% (159/200) |
| 52% (64/123) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (92/159) |
| 38% (6/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (6/13) |
| 30% (108/359) | Return Points Win % | 29% (102/354) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 75% (3/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ruben Bemelmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Patten
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
16 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Daniel Little
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Michael Shaw
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Marius Copil Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Marius Copil
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Marius Copil
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
7
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Marius Copil
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Marius Copil
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Marius Copil
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Marius Copil
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Marius Copil
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
Marius Copil
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (552/419) | Win/Loss | 54% (508/429) |
| 55% (1294/1046) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1182/1033) |
| 52% (12026/11063) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (11371/10901) |
| 54% (154/131) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (117/117) |
| 48% (79/84) | Clay Win/Loss | 48% (151/166) |
| 63% (259/155) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (196/116) |
| 55% (60/49) | Grass Win/Loss | 59% (44/30) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.62 |
| 4063 | Aces Total | 6741 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1912 | Total Double Faults | 2098 |
| 1:5:15 | Average Match Time | 1:10:55 |
| 150.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 537.36 |
| 63% (32697/51842) | 1st Serve % | 59% (30669/52322) |
| 73% (23728/32697) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (23337/30669) |
| 52% (9987/19146) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (11393/21653) |
| 40% (1787/4501) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (1431/3829) |
| 37% (19613/52826) | Return Points Win % | 35% (18063/52250) |
| 56% (65/51) | Slam W/L | 44% (30/38) |
| 36% (9/16) | Masters W/L | 37% (17/29) |
| 35% (8/15) | Cups W/L | 60% (18/12) |
| 50% (77/77) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (95/91) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (263/218) | Challenger W/L | 55% (250/201) |
| 76% (130/42) | Futures W/L | 63% (98/58) |
| 57% (526/916) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (492/897) |
| 43% (19/44) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 50% (208/420) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (238/454) |
| 50% (173/347) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (162/316) |
| 84% (542/456) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (511/424) |
| 15% (542/84) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (511/87) |
| 21% (428/92) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (426/81) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
